Alabama Over Miami? College Football Playoff Chair Explains New Bracket, Rankings

In a surprising turn of events, the College Football Playoff (CFP) selection committee has ranked the University of Alabama above the University of Miami in its latest rankings. This decision has sparked a heated debate among college football fans, with many questioning the committee’s reasoning. CFP chair Boo Corrigan has outlined the factors that influenced the committee’s decision, but the complexities of the situation remain.

Unpacking the Decision

The CFP selection committee uses a variety of criteria to rank teams, including: team record, strength of schedule, head-to-head results, and computer rankings. Both Alabama and Miami have impressive records, but Alabama has a slightly stronger schedule and has defeated several top-ranked teams, including the number one team in the country. Miami, on the other hand, has not played as tough a schedule and has not defeated any top-ranked teams.

However, Miami has one key advantage over Alabama: they defeated the Crimson Tide head-to-head earlier this season. In the past, the CFP committee has often given more weight to head-to-head results than to other factors. This would seem to suggest that Miami should be ranked ahead of Alabama.

Corrigan’s Explanation

CFP chair Boo Corrigan explained that the committee did not give as much weight to the head-to-head result in this case because of the context in which the game was played. Miami defeated Alabama early in the season, when Alabama was still finding its footing. Since then, Alabama has played much better and has proven itself to be one of the best teams in the country.

Corrigan also pointed out that Alabama has a much stronger schedule than Miami. The Crimson Tide have played several top-ranked teams and have won every game by a wide margin. Miami, on the other hand, has not played as tough a schedule and has not defeated any top-ranked teams.

Different Perspectives

The decision to rank Alabama ahead of Miami has been met with mixed reactions. Some fans believe that the committee made the right decision, while others believe that Miami should be ranked ahead of Alabama. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides.

Those who believe that Miami should be ranked ahead of Alabama point to the head-to-head result. They argue that Miami defeated Alabama fair and square and that the committee should not give more weight to other factors. They also point out that Miami has a strong record and has not lost a game all season.

Those who believe that Alabama should be ranked ahead of Miami point to the strength of schedule. They argue that Alabama has played a much tougher schedule than Miami and has defeated several top-ranked teams. They also point out that Alabama has been playing better lately and is one of the hottest teams in the country.

Conclusion

The decision to rank Alabama ahead of Miami is a complex one with no easy answer. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides. Ultimately, the CFP selection committee made the decision that they believe is best for the sport. Only time will tell whether or not they made the right choice.

Implications of the Decision

The decision to rank Alabama ahead of Miami has several implications for the College Football Playoff. First, it means that Alabama will likely qualify for the Playoff, while Miami’s hopes are now in jeopardy. Second, it means that the Playoff will likely be less competitive, as Alabama is one of the strongest teams in the country.

The decision also has implications for the future of the CFP. It shows that the committee is willing to give more weight to strength of schedule than to head-to-head results. This could lead to teams playing tougher schedules in the future in order to improve their chances of qualifying for the Playoff.

The CFP selection process is complex and often controversial. However, the committee’s goal is to select the four best teams in the country to compete for the national championship. The decision to rank Alabama ahead of Miami was a difficult one, but it is one that the committee believes is best for the sport.